In Order to Lawfully Search a Vehicle, Minnesota Police Officers Must First Obtain a Search Warrant.
In order for a police officer to lawfully search a vehicle, they must first obtain a search warrant. All warrantless vehicle searches in Minnesota are presumed to be unconstitutional.
If the police want to conduct warrantless vehicle searches, the justification of the search must fall under one of seven exceptions to the warrant requirement. These search warrant exceptions will be discussed individually in future posts, but for now, the exceptions are:
- Search Incident to Arrest
- Plain View Seizure of Evidence
- Probable Cause to Search for Evidence
- Inventory Search
- Protective Weapons Search
- Consent Search
- Medical Emergency Search
The following is a brief description of each exception. Check back for future posts on each individual search warrant exception.
Search Incident to Arrest
In the context of motor vehicles, this search warrant exception allows Minnesota police officers to lawfully search an occupant of a vehicle and the passenger area of the vehicle
- At the time of arrest the arrested person could easily access the passenger area of the vehicle and any containers in the vehicle; or
- If there is a reasonable belief that evidence of the crime for which the person was arrested might be found in the vehicle. This search warrant exception first requires a lawful arrest.
If the police did not have a right to place the person under arrest, evidence found during any subsequent search will not be admissible. However, if these factors are met, the police may lawfully search the passenger area of the vehicle, including any containers, bags, purses, luggage
Plain View Seizure of Evidence
This search warrant exception allows Minnesota police officers to seize evidence of criminal activity that is in plain view. In other words, if, after a lawful traffic stop, the officer approaches the vehicle and sees a bag of marijuana on the passenger seat, the officer can lawfully seize that evidence without getting a search warrant.
It is not a search to see something in plain sight. It must be immediately apparent to the officer what he is seeing is evidence of criminal activity before he can seize it without a search warrant. A police officer could not, for example, grab a pack of cigarettes to open it and see whether there is a bag of marijuana in it. Cigarettes are not illegal.
Probable Cause to Search for Evidence
This search warrant exception is somewhat unique to motor vehicles. Generally, a Minnesota police officer needs probable cause and a search warrant to lawfully search for evidence. However, due to the mobile nature of motor vehicles, courts have held that as long as the police officer has probable cause to believe evidence of a crime is concealed somewhere in the vehicle, the officer may stop and search the vehicle without a search warrant.
This includes the right to search all packages, bags, and containers that may reasonably hide or contain the evidence. As long as the police officer has enough information to where he could get a search warrant, the mobile nature of motor vehicles does not require the officer actually get the search warrant. But, the officer still needs a probable cause belief of criminal activity first.
If the police are going to tow your vehicle following a lawful traffic stop and/or lawful arrest, they can conduct an inventory search of the vehicle without a search warrant. Most police departments have policies authorizing an inventory search of an impounded vehicle; however, the policy must make clear that the inventory search if part of routine procedure in cases that involved the tow.
The police cannot conduct a search for purposes of finding evidence. The search must be conducted pursuant to department policy to inventory the contents that the police are taking into custody. If the police do happen to find drugs in the vehicle, or any other evidence of criminal activity, that evidence will be admissible and will be used against you.
Protective Weapons Search
Following a lawful traffic stop, the police officer may conduct a limited pat-down search of a person’s clothing if the officer has a reason to believe the person may be armed with a dangerous weapon. The officer must be able to specifically describe why he thought the person was armed with a dangerous weapon if the evidence is challenged in court.
This limited right to conduct a weapons search can extend to the passenger area of the vehicle, including any containers or bags in the vehicle. This is the most restrictive search warrant exception. There are several conditions to be met before a police officer can frisk a driver or passenger and before the officer can expand the search into the vehicle.
As some may know, the police do not have to get a search warrant if the person consents to search. The same is true for searching motor vehicles, with one catch. The police officer must have a reason to suspect criminal activity before he can ask the owner or driver of the vehicle for permission to search.
If the officer legitimately suspects criminal activity and the owner or driver gives the officer permission to search, the officer can search the vehicle without a search warrant. If the owner or driver of the vehicle specifically limits the areas or things they agree an officer can search, the officer must limit the scope of the search to only that area.
For example, if the officer asks the driver if he can search the vehicle and the driver says you can only search the backseat, then the officer cannot search the trunk without further evidence of criminal activity. Evidence found during a lawful consent search will be admissible in court.
If you or someone you know was recently the subject of a police vehicle search, make sure you contact the St. Paul criminal defense lawyers at Arechigo & Stokka today. Our experienced Minnesota criminal defense lawyers will review each and every circumstances surrounding the search of your vehicle.
If the police search does not fall under one of these search warrant exceptions, our aggressive Minnesota criminal defense lawyers will fight to have the evidence thrown out of court.
Attorney John Arechigo has a passion for criminal defense in St. Paul, MN. John received his J.D., from Hamline University School of Law and also carries a Bachelor of Arts from, The University of Minnesota. John was named Attorney of the Year for 2019 by Minnesota Lawyer. Additionally, John was also named as a 2019 Rising Star and was selected to Minnesota Super Lawyers in 2021. He devotes nearly 100% of his practice to defending individuals charged with a crime.